Cathedrals of Science
It is known that in the blast
furnace the reduction of iron oxide is produced by carbon monoxide, according
to the reaction
Fe3O3 + 3CO =
2Fe + 3CO2,
but the gas leaving the chimney
contains a considerable proportion of carbon monoxide, which thus carries away
an important quantity of unutilized heat. Because this incomplete reaction was
thought to be due to an insufficiently prolonged contact between carbon
monoxide and the iron ore, the dimensions of the furnaces have been increased.
In
Comment: The research in science is
driven by economics and is itself an economical process.
So while at the end of the 19th
century free energies were known to be the key to determining chemical
affinity, they were elusive experimentally. But measuring heats of reaction was
easy --- just let the reaction take place in a calorimeter (a sealed vessel
immersed in a water bath) and measure how much the temperature of the water
increased or decreased. If only a way could be found to determine free energies
directly from heat measurements! Lewis's new equation suggested it could be
done. ... Lewis's method was theoretically correct but was not a practical
suggestion. (p. 46)
Comment: Heat is always easier to
measure than free energy, or entropy. The whole thermodynamics seems to how to
relate heat with other factors such as work.
The third law of thermodynamics can
be stated a number of different ways: that the integration constant in Lewis's
equation may be set to zero, that the free energy and heats of reaction
approach each other asymptotically at very low temperatures (Nerst's prefered
formulation), or that the reaction's change in entropy --- a measure of the
randomness diue to heat or atomic disorganization --- is zero at absolute zero.
Unlike the first two laws of thermodynamics, which were developed in examining
how steam engines produce work, the third law's practical impetus was chemical
--- the desire to obtain free energies from heat measurements, and Henri le
Chatelier, Lewis, RIchards, van't Hoff, and Haber had all attacked the problem.
(p. 82)
Comment: Think more about it and see
if it can be related to my works.