Sean Henderson
MSc (NRES)
Candidate
University of
Northern B.C.
A comparison of three approaches for assessing ecosystem resilience in coastal forests using arthropod bioindicators

|
Photo: J. Ainsworth
Bioindicators are used to assess the
impact
of disturbance on biota without sampling the entire biota of a system
(Rainio
& Niemelä, 2003). Current indicators of forest ecosystem health
and resilience
often involve species of vertebrates or plants that are long-lived and
therefore not particularly sensitive to recent disturbance. Arthropods are generally
characterized by
short generation times, and have therefore often been used as
indicators due to
their rapid response to disturbance (Moldenke & Ver Linden
2002).
Unfortunately few arthropod taxa have stable and well-known taxonomies,
a key
factor in determining suitable biodindicators in taxonomic diversity
studies
(see Rainio &Niemelä, 2003). Furthermore, trends in one taxon
are not
necessarily representative of trends in other taxa (Oliver &
Beattie, 1996),
and may not reflect overall trends in arthropod diversity and species
richness.
This problem may be
circumvented by
observing trends in a wider range of taxa within the ground arthropod
community. However,
there is a taxonomic impediment to
using arthropods
as bioindicators due to gaps in taxonomic knowledge where taxa are not
described at all, or are improperly described, along with a lack of
appropriate
and available taxonomic expertise. When partnered with the time
required, these
concerns make it impractical and costly to identify all arthropod
species
sampled in a forest stand .
My research seeks to overcome these
obstacles by examining the utility of using biological diversity
determined by
morphospecies arthropod sorts conducted by parataxonomists and comparing
it to
two other means of quantifying biological diversity. This morphospecies
technique is being employed by the Coast Region Experimental Arthropod
Project
(CREAP) and is the source of my research samples. The
samples were
collected using shallow pitfall traps in the Robert’s Creek Study
Forest
(RCSF), a conifer-dominated coastal western hemlock (CWHdm) forest
containing
alternative harvest treatments, including unharvested controls during
the
summers of 2007 and 2008. Samples are being sorted into morphospecies
based on
obvious physical characteristics to determine morphospecies abundance
and
diversity. The second approach, taxonomic diversity, will then be determined by identifying
ground
beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) to species. The third and final approach, functional diversity, will
be
determined by classifying arthropods from the original morphospecies
sort based
on known biology of individual species or groups of species,
morphological
characteristics (type of mouthparts, specialized appendages (e.g.,
raptorial
legs)), or general knowledge of higher taxonomic groups (Genera.
Families,
Orders, Classes) or morphospecies. Finally, all three methods will be
compared
to examine their ability to detect differences between treatment types.
Literature Cited:
Moldenke, A. and C. Ver Linden.
2002. Literature
synthesis and
recommendations for general surveys for arthropods in soil, litter and
coarse
woody debris in the southern range of the Northern
Spotted Owl. USDA
Forest
Service. Unpubl.
Report. 94 pp.
Oliver, I.
and A.J. Beattie. 1996.
Designing a cost-effective invertebrate survey: a test of methods for
rapid
assessment of biodiversity. Ecological Applications. 6(2):
594-607.
Rainio, J. and J. Niemelä. 2003. Ground beetles
(Coleoptera: Carabida) as bioindicators. Biodiversity and Conservation
12,
487-506.

|
Photo: M. Todd
Contact:
Sean Henderson
Natural Resources and Environmental Studies
University of Northern British Columbia
3333 University Way
Prince George, BC
V2N 4Z9
Canada
henderss@unbc.ca