Sean Henderson
MSc (NRES) Candidate
University of Northern B.C.

 A comparison of three approaches for assessing ecosystem resilience in coastal forests using arthropod bioindicators

Sean checking pitfall trap

Photo: J. Ainsworth

 Bioindicators are used to assess the impact of disturbance on biota without sampling the entire biota of a system (Rainio & Niemelä, 2003). Current indicators of forest ecosystem health and resilience often involve species of vertebrates or plants that are long-lived and therefore not particularly sensitive to recent disturbance.  Arthropods are generally characterized by short generation times, and have therefore often been used as indicators due to their rapid response to disturbance (Moldenke & Ver Linden 2002). Unfortunately few arthropod taxa have stable and well-known taxonomies, a key factor in determining suitable biodindicators in taxonomic diversity studies (see Rainio &Niemelä, 2003). Furthermore, trends in one taxon are not necessarily representative of trends in other taxa (Oliver & Beattie, 1996), and may not reflect overall trends in arthropod diversity and species richness.  This problem may be circumvented by observing trends in a wider range of taxa within the ground arthropod community.  However, there is a taxonomic impediment to using arthropods as bioindicators due to gaps in taxonomic knowledge where taxa are not described at all, or are improperly described, along with a lack of appropriate and available taxonomic expertise. When partnered with the time required, these concerns make it impractical and costly to identify all arthropod species sampled in a forest stand .


My research seeks to overcome these obstacles by examining the utility of using biological diversity determined by morphospecies arthropod sorts conducted by parataxonomists and comparing it to two other means of quantifying biological diversity. This morphospecies technique is being employed by the Coast Region Experimental Arthropod Project (CREAP) and is the source of my research samples. The samples were collected using shallow pitfall traps in the Robert’s Creek Study Forest (RCSF), a conifer-dominated coastal western hemlock (CWHdm) forest containing alternative harvest treatments, including unharvested controls during the summers of 2007 and 2008. Samples are being sorted into morphospecies based on obvious physical characteristics to determine morphospecies abundance and diversity. The second approach, taxonomic diversity, will then be determined by identifying ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) to species. The third and final approach, functional diversity, will be determined by classifying arthropods from the original morphospecies sort based on known biology of individual species or groups of species, morphological characteristics (type of mouthparts, specialized appendages (e.g., raptorial legs)), or general knowledge of higher taxonomic groups (Genera. Families, Orders, Classes) or morphospecies. Finally, all three methods will be compared to examine their ability to detect differences between treatment types.


  Literature Cited:
Moldenke, A. and C. Ver Linden.  2002.  Literature synthesis and recommendations for general surveys for arthropods in soil, litter and coarse woody debris in the southern range of the Northern Spotted Owl.  USDA Forest Service.  Unpubl. Report.  94 pp.
Oliver, I. and A.J. Beattie. 1996. Designing a cost-effective invertebrate survey: a test of methods for rapid assessment of biodiversity. Ecological Applications. 6(2): 594-607.
Rainio, J. and J. Niemelä. 2003. Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabida) as bioindicators. Biodiversity and Conservation 12, 487-506.
Sean in young stand

Photo: M. Todd

Contact:
Sean Henderson
Natural Resources and Environmental Studies
University of Northern British Columbia
3333 University Way
Prince George, BC
V2N 4Z9
Canada
henderss@unbc.ca